Reminder: Progressives DO Want to Take Your Guns, Just Ask NYT


A much repeated lie by Progressive fascists is that "nobody wants to take away Americans' guns." We know this is a lie, of course, because of what Progressive fascists DO (e.g. incrementally make it more difficult to own, possess, and bear arms, starting with the poor and minorities and working up to the rest of us), and what Progressive fascists from time to time SAY in revealing their true agenda.

Take for example this New York Times editorial published just this past December, which states in part:

Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership. It is possible to define those guns in a clear and effective way and, yes, it would require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens.

The types of weapons referred to by the NYT, so-called "assault weapons," are statistically used in zero percent of violent crime. Does anybody believe that Progressive fascists, if successful in forcing (at the threat of Progressive's own guns) Americans to give up lawfully possessed arms of a type not actually used in crime in any substantial way, won't next turn to forcing the turnover of guns that are routinely used in violent crimes--and, incidentally, are also the arms most commonly used for personal protection?

When Hillary calls for "Australian-style gun control," which was explicitly a guns seizure program, that's precisely what she's calling for--the forcible seizure of the arms of law abiding American citizens.

Here's the whole NYT dump, if you can stomach it: